« Old Time Mets - Luplow, Stahl, and Elliot | Main | Yorvit Torrealba? »

2007 - The Unhappy Recap, Part 2

Mike SteffanosSunday, November 11, 2007
By Mike Steffanos

The Starting Pitchers

Continuing our look back at the disappointing 2007 season, we turn our attention to the starters. They took a lot of abuse for the collapse from both fans and the media. While they did, indeed, falter down the stretch, I really don't think the starting pitching deserved all of the blame that was tossed their way.

Tom Glavine was the de facto ace of the staff for most of the season. His last start of the season may well be the most infamous 1/3 of an inning in Mets history, but the two starts before that weren't much better. Glavine's ERA after 31 starts was a respectable 3.88. At the end of the season it was 4.45. You have to really stink out the joint to raise your ERA 57 points that late in the year.

While it's easy to attribute that poor finish to bad timing, I thought as a whole this was Glavine's poorest season with the Mets since his forgettable first year in New York. He pitched very well through his first 8 starts (with an ERA under 3), but much of the rest of the year was a struggle. He was bad more often than not in June and July, rebounded nicely in August and early September, only to come up very small for a team that desperately needed him to stop the bleeding.

The league seems to have caught up to many of the changes the Glavine and Rick Peterson made in his pitching style. Once again, it seems that Tom is quite dependent on the strike zone he is getting from the home plate ump, and is also vulnerable to teams that are willing to take a patient approach at the plate and force him to throw strikes. While I understand all too well that it will be difficult to replace the 200 inning that Glavine contributed in 2007, I've honestly come to the point where I hope that Glavine does indeed go home to Atlanta next season. I don't feel this way because I'm sulking about his last 3 starts. I actually came to that line of thinking during the season. The Mets need to explore other options and get younger. Glavine needs to be closer to his family during the school year. It really doesn't make sense for him to return.

The two 26-year-olds in the rotation behind Glavine took a lot of heat for their own struggles down the stretch -- ironically, often from the same pundits who gave Glavine a pass for his late season stumbles. You'll forgive me if I find this somewhat unfair. I was generally happy with both young starters in 2007, and felt they gave the Mets all they could have reasonably expected.

Yes, John Maine had a rough time after the All Star break, but gave the Mets 32 starts and a solid 191 innings. Keeping in mind that this was a 26-year old pitcher who had thrown 147, 151, 168 and 152 innings in his previous 4 years as a pro, this was a significant step up. You also had to like the way he stepped up the second-to-last game of the season to give the Mets a chance.

His fellow 26-year-old starter, Oliver Perez, contributed 29 starts and 177 innings to the cause. He also seemed to tire in August, losing the extra oomph on his pitches and uncharacteristically struggling to put batters away. While he can still be erratic at times, he took a huge step forward in 2007 from the completely lost young left-hander the Mets picked up the year before.

Going forward, the Mets now have 2 talented young pitchers to team with Pedro Martinez and build their staff around. Given all of the uncertainty that surrounded the rotation heading into the 2007 campaign, this is a nice step in the right direction. While it may have cost them in the short run, they're in good shape for the long haul.

Orlando Hernandez was the Mets most effective starter when he was healthy. The 24 starts and 147 innings pitched were about what it was reasonable to expect from the veteran Cuban heading into the season, but the timing was awful when he went down in late August when Maine and Perez were struggling.

What compounded the loss of Hernandez was that the pitchers the Mets were counting on for rotation depth for situations like El Duque's injury didn't pan out. Jason Vargas was terrible in 2 fill-in starts; Mike Pelfrey and Brian Lawrence came up lacking in fifth starter auditions and as fill-ins; and Jorge Sosa proved better suited for the bullpen. At one time or another, Chan Ho Park, Dave Williams, and Phillip Humber did not impress in spot starts. Pedro Martinez did a nice job in 5 September starts after his return, but there wasn't enough time to save the season for the Mets at that point.

For all the pitchers who came up short as the fifth starter or in starts, at least Pelfrey and Humber (and maybe Vargas) have a chance to help this team down the road. Park and Williams were only given a single start each. Lawrence, on the other hand, wound up making 6 starts for the Mets in August and September, despite only being effective his second time out against the Marlins. He allowed 37 hits and 4 HR in only 25.2 total innings. Moreover, a pitcher who made a career of pitching to contact but throwing strikes allowed 12 walks in his limited opportunities. It was puzzling at the time, and in retrospect, why he was given so many chances to be bad. Teams less inclined to play things conventional and safe might have rolled the dice with a Pelfrey or a Humber. Pelfrey's numbers were actually better, and Humber had been pitching well in Triple-A.

In my mind, while Maine and Perez seem to take the majority of the heat in the media, the bigger factors were these:

Glavine's inconsistency
He ERA in April, May and August was 2.80, 4.03 and 3.13. In June, July and September it was 5.83, 5.14 and 6.10. Any team that displayed a patient approach with Glavine was almost invariably able to hit him. He can still dazzle at times when he has the great changeup, but when things aren't perfect he seems to be constantly pitching in a 3-1 count. Realistically, at this stage of his career Glavine is a third or fourth starter in a good rotation.

Minaya's failure to build effective depth in the system
I thought Jason Vargas was a great pickup for rotation depth last winter. He wasn't just terrible with the Mets, however, he wasn't really good in Triple-A, either. Maybe it was injuries (he had surgery after the season) but his velocity was mid-80s, and his control wasn't great. Park, Williams and Lawrence couldn't fill the bill, and Pelfrey and Humber weren't ready. It all combined to make trading away Brian Bannister look like a really big mistake. Time will certainly tell on pitchers like Ambiorix Burgos, Vargas and Adam Bostick, but the bottom line for 2007 was that the pitchers traded away helped their teams much more than any the Mets received in return.

Playing it safe
Giving 6 starts to Brian Lawrence was the "safe" play, but the Mets were 1-5 in those starts. Lawrence never showed signs of being an effective starter. While giving those starts to a Phillip Humber might not have led to any more wins, it's hard to argue he could have done much worse. We'll never know if they could have caught some lightning in a bottle by allowing Humber to settle into the rotation.

Was too much emphasis placed on Pelfrey developing secondary pitches?
When I look back on the season, I wonder what might have happened if the Mets were able to get something out of their fifth starter. In retrospect, I wonder if the Mets should have put their efforts with Mike Pelfrey into throwing strikes down in the zone with his fastball. So much effort went into trying to get him to throw his slider and changeup for strikes, yet his fastball command -- which had been a strength -- was spotty at best last season. With that gone, he had no real strength to from which to build in my mind. I'd like to see tightening up command of that plus fastball be a priority next season. His fastball is good enough to win with if he can throw it for quality strikes. The secondary stuff is moot if he's constantly behind in the count.

What's overlooked in the disappointment with 2007 were the steps taken in a positive direction for the future. Maine and Perez give the Mets 2 solid young building blocks for their rotation. Pedro looked good enough after his return to offer hope that he can be effective next season. Pelfrey and Humber still have promise, and Kevin Mulvey should be in the mix, also.

Next: the position players.

About Mike: I was the original writer on this web site, actually its only writer for the first 15 months of existence. Although I am grateful for the excellent contributions of my fellow writers here, I have no plans of stepping back into strictly an editorial role. I started this thing in the first place because I love to write and I love the Mets, and blogging here keeps me somewhat sane. If you haven't had enough already, more bio info can be found here.

Support Mike's Mets by shopping at our Amazon Store

More Mets Stories:
SportsSpyder Mets

Continuous Mets Coverage:
Hot Foot

Comments (6)


The league seems to have caught up to many of the changes the Glavine and Rick Peterson made in his pitching style.

When they had become ancient players, both Pete Rose and Willie Mays (apparently) made conscious decisions to change their approach, and try and stave off extinction for another summer. In both men's cases it ammounted to becoming extremely selective at the plate, not offering until they got a pitch they could handle, and take the walk when offered.

In his 44th year, Pete Rose's batting average declined 44 points, but his On Base Percentage rose 36 points. Similarly, in his 40th year Mays batting average declines twenty points, but his OBP rose 35 points.

Adjustments is what smart, great players do, and you can't name three much smarter at playing baseball than Rose, Mays and Glavine.

The thing is, the fix didn't start either player off on a string of good seasons. They were career extenders, mechanisms for putting off the inevitable for another season. Adjustments that turn back the clock? That's asking too much of the concept.

Why would the Mets wish to hang onto Tom Glavine beyond his expiration date, when the same money he would cost would pay for most of a quality who doesn't know what it's like to log 240 innings during the Reagan administration? I appreciate how Tom figured out how to extend his career, but to bet that he can continue the magic another season is just too long odds.

Agreed on Pelfrey too. Throw the damn ball!

John Maine shows me the most promise of all our pitchers, I feel when he pitches we got a good chance to win with a strong effort and many innings, 7, 8 even the unheard of compleat game.For me he is an untouchable in trade talks.He is good now and getting better.

I like the strides Maine and Perez made in 2007, and I think their progress will continue in 2008. Martinez should provide some stability, I still believe El-Duque at this stage is better suited to come out of the pen and provide some spot starts. Pelfrey should be allowed to go back to what made him a success, his fastball, but hopefully this off-season he works on his secondary pitches. Humber is going to be alright, I think he was still working on arm strength and command last year, which I feel will be much improved in 2008. Mulvey may suprise but will the burden of contention fool with his mind a bit or someone monkeying with his mechanics. It still comes down to the Mets getting another arm in the rotation and maybe two in the pen. We shall see.

dd - Agreed. I think Glavine is standing right on the edge of his career, unless he finds another change that can keep hitters off balance for a while.
Al - No one is untouchable if the right deal is out there, but I agree that most trade scenarios I've heard that included Maine make no sense.
LJ - I'm with you on Humber. I thought this season was about staying healthy and getting some innings under his belt, and was judged too harshly in some quarters based strictly on the numbers.

Bottomline, 2007 was about Glavine getting 300. Mission accomplished. Just like with Piazza's hoorah, now i think the Mets move on. Glavine SHOULD retire. 307 is enough. I really doubt Glavine, given the seeds of doubt which must be there can be effective for a contender.

BUT in the absence of Glavine I think an experienced starter is a must. Pedro's health has a cloud. I think there is enough talent to make one trade, maybe two. AJ burnett is MY top choice as he MUST be traded now or the Jays will get nothing for him in the season (injury risk, bad kharma, walk clause).

El Duque CAN be the best starter, but I think if he does pitch he needs to be in a swingman role ala Brett Tomko, giving insurance for Pedro et al for short periods.

About Mike's Mets

Please support Mike's Mets:

Disclaimer: Mike's Mets is an independent, unofficial fan site, and is not affiliated in any way with the New York Mets or Major League Baseball.

Other Links

General Baseball Links
Internet Radio Shows
Video Blogs
Other Team Links
Other Sports Links
Non-Sports Links
Video Direct

Looking for great deals on MLB Baseball Tickets? Visit JustgreatTickets.com for Cubs Tickets, NY Mets Tickets and a huge selection of Red Sox Tickets, Yankees Tickets and plenty of great concert Tickets for Dave Matthews Band Tickets and Buffett Tickets

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 4.1