« Hasta La Vista | Main | Trades From The Past - Millan and Stone for Gentry and Frisella »

Catching Up On the Week

Mike SteffanosSaturday, November 24, 2007
By Mike Steffanos

Sorry to disappear on you for a few days. Work got crazy again and then Lisa got even crazier as we prepared to have family over for Thanksgiving -- the first holiday we hosted in our new house. Although I didn't have a chance to comment yet on the Guillermo Mota for Johnny Estrada deal, I think 99% of us see that as a virtual no-brainer. Although I think Mota's problems were mental rather than physical, and there is a decent chance he can have an effective year, the chances of him pulling that turn around in New York were very small. In the meantime, although Estrada has some issues both on and off the field, the Mets at least bought themselves some breathing room at catcher. Now they can look for a deal that makes sense or roll this dice with Castro and Estrada sharing time at catcher.

Estrada isn't a great offensive player, but he's probably an upgrade over Torrealba. He's not the most patient of hitters, walking only 25 times in over 900 plate appearances the past two seasons. The number of pitches he sees per PA has declined steadily since his fine 2004 season in Atlanta, from 3.47 that year to 2.99 last season. He has decent power for a catcher, but not enough to make up for his lack of patience. His defense has declined, although that appears to be related to some injuries.

Picking up Estrada for a reliever who needed to move on allows Minaya to pursue other catching options without being a position of weakness. It was a swift and sensible response to the collapse of the Torrealba deal.


When Tom Glavine re-signed with the Mets last year, we all knew that it was only because Atlanta failed to make an offer. Still, his return probably allowed the Mets to pass on Barry Zito (4.53 ERA), Jeff Supan (4.62 ERA, 243 hits allowed in 207 IP) and other overpriced options from last year's market. Still, there was a sense when watching Glavine pitch that we were cheering on a guy who really didn't want to be here. I honestly don't understand why so many in the media feel that the fans didn't "appreciate" Glavine enough, and believe that we're only glad to see him go because of that last game of the season.

Glavine treated members of the media well, and they all seemed to like him. I'm sure they'll have a nice reunion when the Mets and Braves play each other. But if they can't understand why fans are reluctant to root for someone who would rather be playing somewhere else, though, they're just not very perceptive.

Hey, I'm sure there are plenty of fans that are angry with Glavine, but even many of us who aren't are still relieved that he's gone. He really seems to be declining dramatically as a pitcher, and it's time for the Mets to get younger and move on. ESPN's Keith Law is extremely pessimistic for Glavine in 2008:

Glavine's stuff is just about gone. His fastball is only 80-84 mph and looks softer than that, almost like BP fastballs. His curveball is a big slow roller around 75-77 mph, and his changeup -- once a plus pitch -- is fringe-average, mostly 74-75 mph, but the way his arm slows as he throws it is a tip-off to observant hitters. His command is good, but needs to be almost perfect, and his game plan is to avoid contact at all costs. If he's not getting a generous strike zone, he's in trouble because his stuff is so hittable, and he doesn't have a pitch with which he can fool hitters.

Glavine's statistical record bears all of this out. His 2007 stat line featured his second-highest ERA and worst strikeout rate since 1988, his highest home-run allowed rate (in a good pitchers' park too), and the worst groundball rate of his career. He's now moving to a less pitcher-friendly park, especially to flyball pitchers, and he's leaving behind one of the best defensive units in baseball, with perhaps the best fielders at their positions in center, at short, and at third.

I don't think I'm quite as pessimistic for Glavine as Law seems to be, but it wouldn't surprise me too much if he wasn't very good in 2008. The bottom line was that he didn't want to pitch here in 2007, much less 2008. The Mets get Atlanta's first round pick and a sandwich round pick in return for a player who didn't want to be here. That seems like a pretty good deal. You'll forgive me if I shed no tears at Glavine's departure. He seems like a decent guy, and he was serviceable if not spectacular for most of his 5 years in New York. Of course, he was paid very well for that. Live a happy life, Tom -- but don't let the door hit you on the way out, buddy.


People keep asking me about Santana. To be honest with you, I don't see him coming here unless the Mets are willing to part with a Wright or Reyes as the key player in the deal. The Mets just don't have the kind of "can't miss" pitching prospect that would be the centerpiece of an all prospect deal that Twins management could sell to their fan base.

Sometimes fans are so hot for a player on another team that they don't stop to consider how that club's fan base would react to a trade. I'm sure many Twins fans understandably are annoyed by the endless speculation surrounding a player they watched grow into being arguably the best pitcher in baseball. With Hunter already out of the picture, they're going to need to see something that makes sense to them in return for their prized lefty. While I feel that it's inevitable that Omar will make a deal for a good young pitcher, I think it will be of a tier below Johan Santana.

About Mike: I was the original writer on this web site, actually its only writer for the first 15 months of existence. Although I am grateful for the excellent contributions of my fellow writers here, I have no plans of stepping back into strictly an editorial role. I started this thing in the first place because I love to write and I love the Mets, and blogging here keeps me somewhat sane. If you haven't had enough already, more bio info can be found here.

Support Mike's Mets by shopping at our Amazon Store

More Mets Stories:
SportsSpyder Mets

Continuous Mets Coverage:
Hot Foot

Comments (5)

All things being equal, I'd tend to agree with your analysis on Santana. Perhaps they're not equal, though.

With both Santana now and Joe Nathan next year, the Twinkies may factor in more than just return on investment in terms of dollars or players in return. If I were Carl Pohlad (can I be? pleaseplease?), the last thing I'd do is work a trade with That Other Team in New York, or any of the other deep-pocket playahs in the AL. A trade to the Mets or other NL team means I only have to regret my mistake one start every three years (every six at home, give or take) versus 12 times a year or whatever it is in interdivision AL play these days.

Plus I'd be especially pissed at the Yankees right now, because their Rivera deal just set (and from Minnesota's POV, probably broke) the market for relievers just in time for Joe Nathan. If he gets traded to the Bronx, he'll probably out-A-Rod even A-Rod, and that, in turn, will set the market for Liriano and the rest of the young arms up dere.

I'm not sure I'm itching to get Santana as my answer; I've observed in the past that few, if any, of our best pitching performances came from established other-team stars. It'd still beat a stick, or a piece of Clemens-hurled bat, in the eye, though.

Santanna to much to give up! I think 2 are better thn one. I would go after Blanton and Harden or haren. shot for Bedford and garza. Even Willis and kazmir and still have "some" young out fielders for the future.

Hope you're enjoying your leftovers Mike. They are delicious aren't they?

Though ultimately I don't see Santana ending up with the Mets, I don't think the Twins will be able to truly command the young,established star position player they seem to be demanding (Reyes, Cano, etc.) It certainly doesn't help their cause that Santana is demanding a starting point of around $140-150 million. Not that he isn't likely to make that much, but when you think about that kind of contract for a player that the other team basically has to trade, you're not so keen on readily giving up your young established stars as well.

In the end I think he ends up on the Dodgers or Yankees. And if by some miracle he's a Met, it will cost the Mets Milledge, Gomez, Heilman, Pelfrey and probably Mulvey. No small price for 1 man. I dare say it makes the acquistion of Frank Viola look like a bargain.

As much as I'd love Santana on this team, I think it is very important that Omar set the market, rather than be set aside by it. I hope he's aggresive, and gets his man quickly. The first big pitcher to get moved will make the rest that much more costly.

Yo, I have a New Year's Resolution all ready already: I pledge NOT to carp about the Mota-for Estrada deal, ever, even if Mota somehow gets himself back on track. Though "somehow" would have to involve widespread bribery and corruption if last year's pitching meant anything.

Sic 'em, Mike! (Piazza)

Ray - There are teams in the NL with more highly regarded prospects with the Mets, so I guess a lot would depend on who wants to get in. As for Santana, part of me drools for him and another part wonders what happens if the Mets give up big talent to get him, huge money to lock him up, and then he gets hurt. It's getting harder and harder to insure long-term deals for pitchers. It would be nice to have a guy like that pitching game 1 of the W.S., though.
Al - You're quite an optimist. I'll settle for getting one quality pitcher.
Salman - I think you have a good point there on moving quickly.
dd - I agree. Like I said, no matter what happens to him in Milwaukee, I doubt very much he would have pitched well here.

About Mike's Mets

Please support Mike's Mets:

Disclaimer: Mike's Mets is an independent, unofficial fan site, and is not affiliated in any way with the New York Mets or Major League Baseball.

Other Links

General Baseball Links
Internet Radio Shows
Video Blogs
Other Team Links
Other Sports Links
Non-Sports Links
Video Direct

Looking for great deals on MLB Baseball Tickets? Visit JustgreatTickets.com for Cubs Tickets, NY Mets Tickets and a huge selection of Red Sox Tickets, Yankees Tickets and plenty of great concert Tickets for Dave Matthews Band Tickets and Buffett Tickets

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 4.1