« A Throw-in on the Deal? | Main | A New Chapter in the John Maine Saga »

Twisted Logic

Mike SteffanosWednesday, February 27, 2008
By Mike Steffanos

As a general rule, I've enjoyed Jon Heyman's MLB columns on SI.com. They're entertaining and are a good way to keep up to date on what's happening around baseball. I have a somewhat different view on many of the issues than Heyman, but I can say the same thing about most baseball writers.

When I read his Monday column I was more amused than annoyed by his fawning endorsement of all things Jimmy Rollins. Using the exact same convoluted logic that WFAN's Chris Russo makes his own bizarre arguments with, Heyman "proves" only his bizarre ongoing man-crush on Rollins and willingness to pander to the anti-New York bias of his national audience.

My first impulse was to ignore this, which I have done for two days. But what the heck, it's a slow week for things to write about. (Who cares if college kids bunted on Wagner? He should have done what Nolan Ryan would have done and drilled the next kid who came to bat.)

If you heard the sound clip when Beltran made his statement this spring, the writers all laughed. Other than Troglodytes like Brett Meyers, the truth is that most of the players get along fairly well. It's the fans who really dislike each other. Rollins seemed amused by the statement and his answer back was funny.

For some reason though, Heyman feels the need to opine that the Mets were "afraid" to answer Rollins last year, and that fear and the weight of Jimmy's words somehow built up over the season as the Mets played "scared". Does Heyman really believe that grown men who are professional baseball players are that affected by words? I hope not.

Of the many things I wanted to do but could never find the time for this winter, I started a series on what went wrong for the Mets and never had the time to finish it. I was extremely disappointed by the 2007 Mets, and rank them as by far the most disappointing Mets team I have rooted for in just under four decades of being a fan. I certainly don't defend what happened to them last season, but I am dumbfounded by the simplistic narrative that has become accepted as "fact" by so many in the media.

The sad, simple truth was the Mets sleepwalked through most of the months of June, July and August. We all expected to see a sense of purpose and urgency from a team that had a very disappointing end to 2006, but what we saw was a club that thought they could coast through the regular season and pick it up in the playoffs. The Phillies and Braves were enduring their own struggles, and the Mets seemed content to hold the division lead by default rather than merit. If I have one picture that replays in my mind and bothers me the most from last year it was how many games the Mets offense underperformed against mediocre and even bad pitching -- showing no discipline at the plate and little repentance after the game. I've previously made the point here, so I won't beat it to death. We were all frustrated by the lack of the work ethic we saw in 2006.

I wish they were actually playing scared those months, because it would have motivated them to stop screwing around. Instead, they let the Phillies hang around, and then buried by a freight train of momentum that went against them.

I'll agree with Heyman in that the Phillies did indeed beat the Mets convincingly in winning the last 7 games played between them. The Mets pitching seemed tired, Wagner got hurt and was ineffective, and the hitters displayed the same maddening lack of plate discipline -- particularly against the Phillies bullpen. Funny, but when you allow bad habits to become ingrained they can wind up costing you.

I'll give Rollins credit for being a team leader all year and for playing great in big moments. It's delusional and utterly simplistic to think that Rollins' words had anything to do with what happened to the Mets, and I'm tired of reading silly stuff like that. In the end, the failure to take the season seriously enough undermined the Mets, and that to me is enough of an indictment against the 2007 Mets than this silly fairy tale. Their punishment for their sins will be to have to answer questions about last year every time they go into a losing streak.

As for Heyman's arguments for Rollins vs. Wright for MVP, I could frankly care less. To me the MVP is a strange, flawed award in that people have wildly divergent opinions on what makes a player most valuable. Is it for the guy who's the best player, or the one who helped his team win more, or whatever other interpretations in between? The answer seems to change from year to year.

I have no problem with Rollins winning. He had a great year, he was his team's leader, and took pressure off his teammates by putting it on himself. If Beltran is trying to do a little of that himself I welcome it, even if Heyman isn't impressed. As for the other stuff, it may sound colorful and make a good story, but it doesn't ring true. And by the way, Heyman's assumption that Wright's MVP case is damaged by the Mets collapse fails to take into account how well Wright played while the ship was sinking. Below are a comparison of Rollins and Wright's numbers in September when everything was playing out:


Despite being a 24-year-old with only 3 years experience, Wright assumed the role of team leader and answered question after dreary question about the Mets' collapse while putting up fabulous numbers. If you want to give Rollins the MVP, I have no problem with that. But Heyman's grudging admission that the collapse was "no fault of Wright's" doesn't really tell the story, does it? I'll never forget how hard David fought to turn things around down the stretch when it would have been human nature to crumble.

I've made the comparison earlier to Chris "Mad Dog" Russo. Heyman follows the playbook here of presenting only the facts that are favorable to his theory, and then declaring his view the winner in Russo's emphatic case-closed manner. I hope Jon and Jimmy Rollins are very happy together going forward, but Heyman isn't right simply because he assures us that he is.

About Mike: I was the original writer on this web site, actually its only writer for the first 15 months of existence. Although I am grateful for the excellent contributions of my fellow writers here, I have no plans of stepping back into strictly an editorial role. I started this thing in the first place because I love to write and I love the Mets, and blogging here keeps me somewhat sane. If you haven't had enough already, more bio info can be found here.

Support Mike's Mets by shopping at our Amazon Store

Comments (6)

Chris Russo...oy vey. Today he's babbling on about how Ollie Perez is awful and he thinks he stinks and Russo insists on his opinion despite the fact that Ollie statistically was head and shoulders above the average MLB pitcher. Unbelievable.

I worked behind the scenes at a short-lived TV network called NewSport in the mid-90's. They were the network that wanted to be Pepsi to ESPN's Coke, but they never got any traction.

Their programming director mentioned they were looking for a host for a new show, so I threw Russo's name out there. The PD said, "I would never hire him". I asked why not. He said, matter-of-factly, "Because he's an idiot".

I've pointed out the following factiod often, but the Rabid Dog must not have been listening to me. Oliver Perez had a better year in '07 in nearly every category that did Barry (I'm Worth $17 Million a Year) Zito.

More wins, fewer losses, an ERA nearly one run better, way more K's, fewer walks, fewer runs, fewer earned runs, fewer homers allowed.

Dang it. Ollie hit three more batters than Barry did last year. Maybe Russo IS right...

PS - Willie Collazo needs to be granted his unconditional release right away.

Outside of little league and maybe some high school ball, how many sports writers have had successful baseball careers? Honestly I don't know of any(someone prove otherwise). When I want news, opinions, stats, etc, I come here. Maybe SI, the Post, Daily News, and others should poll what, where, and by whom readers are getting real baseball information from. Then they can get rid of these so-called uninformed beat writers and columnists who are so overly opinionated. Give me back Warner Wolf and " Lets go to the video tape" any day versus some of these guys. However on this site I enjoy the wit, the passion, and the honesty I get from the several writers showcased right here. Again Mike I thank you and all the others. Keep hope alive in Metsville!

Outside of little league and maybe some high school ball, how many sports writers have had successful baseball careers?

Jim Brosnan was closer (co-closer, actually) for a pennant winner, the 1961 Cincinnati Reds. An exception that proves the rule, or words to that effect.

Hey guys. Great comments today. Just one thought:

I don't think that you have had a successful baseball career to have an understanding of the sport. I just think sportswriters and columnists can't resist the urge to oversimplify things. That makes for better stories than really in-depth or detailed analysis.

Take pro wrestling. Everyone but the zaniest die-hards understand it's fake, but it's popularity is off the charts. People love the simple story lines, and I can't fault guys like Klapisch and Heyman for giving it to them. Sometimes, though, a particular piece like this one really gets on my nerves.

Sad about Collazo, Nostra. He spends a couple of years in the minors pitching very well and at least becoming a fringy prospect, then goes out the first spring training game of the year and has a nightmare inning in a way that people are going to remember. Not fair. He'd better have some really good outings soon.

About Mike's Mets

Please support Mike's Mets:

Disclaimer: Mike's Mets is an independent, unofficial fan site, and is not affiliated in any way with the New York Mets or Major League Baseball.

Other Links

General Baseball Links
Internet Radio Shows
Video Blogs
Other Team Links
Other Sports Links
Non-Sports Links
Video Direct

Looking for great deals on MLB Baseball Tickets? Visit JustgreatTickets.com for Cubs Tickets, NY Mets Tickets and a huge selection of Red Sox Tickets, Yankees Tickets and plenty of great concert Tickets for Dave Matthews Band Tickets and Buffett Tickets

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 4.1