« It's Survival in the Citi | Main | Thoughts on the Perez Contract »

A Perez Deal Done?

Mike SteffanosMonday, February 2, 2009
By Mike Steffanos

According to Jon Heyman and Ken Rosenthal, as well as some other sources, the Mets are close to re-signing Oliver Perez.

Of course, we've heard stuff like that before, but it makes sense that there would be a push to get something done with spring training almost here. I don't know about you, but it would be quite a relief to me to stop having to read speculative stories every day on who the Mets might sign to pitch.

Regular readers have probably noted that I have been MIA for a couple of days. I had a work project Friday evening that went horribly, horribly wrong. I was up until 7:30 am Saturday pulling out what was left of my hair.

I got a couple of hours sleep and then I went down to Stamford to meet a fellow blogger, Joe Janish (my first interview victim subject). I managed to get enough caffeine in me to make it down there and had a good time.

Joe was doing an interview with Kerel Cooper, who does a video baseball blog at OntheBlack.com. Also being interviewed were Dave Doyle of The Mets Report and Andrew Vazzano of The 'Ropolitans. I only caught the end of it, but it seemed like a lively one. Check it out at Kerel's blog, which I have added a link to on the sidebar.

I was a little beat, but I enjoyed talking baseball with fellow Mets fans and bloggers, something I don't get to do very often living so far from New York. I also have 3 new potential interview victims subjects.

I crashed pretty early Saturday night, and Sunday I was still feeling it, so I decided to take the rest of the weekend off. I want to catch up on some work stuff, and then I'll try to get around to finishing that multi-part post on the Mets payroll this week.

Finally, when I wrote that piece about unscrupulous politicians trying to make a case that Citigroup could somehow "cancel" their deal with the Mets for the Citi Field naming rights, I got some weird emails from people thinking I was pro-Citigroup.

If you read what I've actually written on the subject, you'll see I've never defended Citigroup which, along with the other financial institutions taking our tax dollars in bailouts, deserves condemnation for the greed and short-sightedness behind the business decisions that put us all in this mess. Certainly if Citibank goes under eventually this naming rights deal is moot.

What I find annoying here is that these pols are perpetuating a fraud on the public that Citigroup could unilaterally pull out of this deal if they wished to. As anyone who ever signed a contract for anything knows, it's not that simple.

From the Mets point of view, they have a valid contract signed by both parties in good faith at a time before this mess started. They have no responsibility for what Citigroup did wrong. Although some Mets fans think that the Mets should just walk away from this deal, I can't blame them for not wanting to kiss away $20 million a year. Certainly in this economy they're not going to get a new sponsor for anything close to that.

Again, I have to point out that the Mets did nothing wrong here. I may have a lot of places where I disagree with what the franchise is doing, but it's simplistic and somewhat foolish to think that $20 million (which I'm sure is part of their budget already) isn't a lot of money.

I do think the Mets are underestimating how much negative publicity they are going to get from this, and also how long it will last. At the very least I still believe they would be well advised to see if something couldn't be renegotiated as a sign of good faith right now, but that's up to them. It's still wrong for unscrupulous pols to oversimplify a complicated matter just to score cheap political points. It's just not that easy, and they know better.

Speaking of politics, despite the fact that I am a Democrat of liberal leanings, I very, very seldom make any political mention in this blog. I understand you're here to read about the Mets, not politics. I would appreciate if we could keep partisan politics out of the comments, too.

Finally, Mets tickets for 2009 are selling out fast for that new little bandbox they've built. My friends at Ticket Solutions have single-game Mets Tickets available for virtually any game.

By the way, Joel Sherman is reporting that Perez is a done deal, pending a physical.

About Mike: I was the original writer on this web site, actually its only writer for the first 15 months of existence. Although I am grateful for the excellent contributions of my fellow writers here, I have no plans of stepping back into strictly an editorial role. I started this thing in the first place because I love to write and I love the Mets, and blogging here keeps me somewhat sane. If you haven't had enough already, more bio info can be found here.

Support Mike's Mets by shopping at our Amazon Store

Comments (4)

Hey Mike, it's Mack.

I just wanted to clarify your comments about "speculative" reporting.

I guess I started all of this 10 days ago when I reported one of my "sources" told me the OP deal would be done by Sunday (which, as it turns out, was done, and announced today, pending a Doc ok.).

If you are referring to me, there was nothing speculative.

I received a phone call from someone who would know this stuff and I reported what I was told I could report, without using that person's name.

Good to see your piece.



36 mill for 3 years ..as long as maine is healthy we look pretty good from 1-4..niese, redding and garcia will battle for the 5 spot..with the 8th and the ninth taken care of by putz and krod, hopefully perez can be a 15 game winner as per 2007.lets go mets!!!i'm ready for pitchers and catchers ..

Ok, Ollie in the fold, Sheets or Wolf, a bat, and a reliever? Still somethings to be addressed, but I won't hold my breath. Take care Mike. 2 weeks til pitchers and catchers report. Lets Go Baseball!

Perez is in the fold; I'm okay with that, even if they will be paying too much for this market.

Since we're this far along, I think it's time the Mets made an offer to Adam Dunn. All Dunn would do, besides look bad seven or eight times in left field, is raise the team's on base percentage, slugging percentage and ability to score runs. So he bats left handed; so let's see if the Mets can win 75% of their games against righthanders. A short term deal would benefit both sides.

If not, if the Wilpons simply can't justify the outlay, so be it. One thing, though: I sure hope they aren't counting on some big contribution from Fernando Tatis, cause there is absolutely no telling what the Mets will get from him. Fernando was a great story for a while last year, but let's not get caught up in the narriative.

About Mike's Mets

Please support Mike's Mets:

Disclaimer: Mike's Mets is an independent, unofficial fan site, and is not affiliated in any way with the New York Mets or Major League Baseball.

Other Links

General Baseball Links
Internet Radio Shows
Video Blogs
Other Team Links
Other Sports Links
Non-Sports Links
Video Direct

Looking for great deals on MLB Baseball Tickets? Visit JustgreatTickets.com for Cubs Tickets, NY Mets Tickets and a huge selection of Red Sox Tickets, Yankees Tickets and plenty of great concert Tickets for Dave Matthews Band Tickets and Buffett Tickets

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 4.1