While there was plenty of humor and lively discussions, these things were always secondary to the game being played on the field. For instance, one of the things I enjoyed most about Ralph Kiner was his terrific stories from a lifetime in the game. Ralph had a million of them, but he would share these anecdotes around that day's game he was calling, never over it.
Tim McCarver may have drawn some criticism his last few years with FOX, but he really was a breath of fresh air when calling Mets games. McCarver, in his prime, was brilliant in being able to interject his own unique take on the game, even criticizing Manager Davey Johnson at times but avoiding stepping on the game itself. I think that's part of the reason those over-the-top FOX broadcasts with McCarver and Joe Buck used to irritate me so very much — I just knew that they could do better. The irritating cacophony that often threatened to drown out the game itself was considered by FOX to be a feature, not a bug.
When I was young, baseball was still considered America's game. If you hear somebody referring to it that way these days, you can rest assured that they're doing it ironically. As I mentioned yesterday, changes to the game over recent decades have created long gaps between moments of on-the-field action. As the public's attention span seemingly grows shorter and shorter, there is concern among the networks that baseball is becoming more boring. That's not a good combination for attracting eyes to commercials, the primary goals of these networks.
I've watched uncomfortably in recent years as networks like ESPN and FOX increasingly rely on gimmicks to "spice up" their baseball telecasts. It's gotten to the point now where I get the feeling that these folks don't have much love or even respect for the game of baseball. I watched with dismay a couple of seasons ago when Pete Alonso hit his rookie record-setting home run during a FOX broadcast with one of their lesser announcing teams calling the game. The announcers were actually doing one of those obnoxious in-game interviews with the immortal Adam Duvall when the home run was hit. Having a guy at the plate with a chance to break an all-time record wasn't reason enough to table that garbage for a single batter.
I've gotten to the point in recent years where if a game is on FOX or ESPN, I don't watch it live anymore. I'll listen to the radio call and, if something interesting happens that I want to get a look at, I'll go to my DVR and watch that one thing. I refuse to give these clowns 3 hours + of my time any longer.
Against my better judgment Thursday, I put on ESPN's telecast of the game. I really wanted to check out some of the pitchers. I couldn't even make it through the first inning with David Peterson on the mound. ESPN is doing a live interview with Juan Soto, and, of course, they have to go to a split-screen with Soto on one side and the game on the other. Peterson is pitching on about 1/3 of my screen. It feels like the old days when I was a kid and watching Mets games on a 13" tv in my bedroom. Soto may be a heck of a ballplayer, but he has nothing interesting to say.
I turned the freaking game off. I don't know anyone who believes the game of baseball is served with that kind of broadcast. There are certainly things that need to be fixed in today's game. It does get boring to watch a 10-pitch at-bat where the batter has to step out 9 times to adjust his batting gloves and take a couple of practice swings between every pitch. Having this action in a split-screen with an even more boring player interview doesn't help. How many of these interviews must we sit through before we realize that 95% of ballplayers have literally nothing interesting to say?
I know a post like this won't change anything, but it did me some good to get it off my chest. I'll be back tomorrow with a regular post. Please stay safe, be well, and take care.
Follow me on Twitter @MikeSteffanos.